May 14, 2012

Royalty Changes



Record Industry Braces for Artists’ Battles Over Song Rights




Since their release in 1978, hit albums like Bruce Springsteen’s “Darkness on the Edge of Town,” Billy Joel’s “52nd Street,” the Doobie Brothers’ “Minute by Minute,” Kenny Rogers’s “Gambler” and Funkadelic’s “One Nation Under a Groove” have generated tens of millions of dollars for record companies. But thanks to a little-noted provision in United States copyright law, those artists — and thousands more — now have the right to reclaim ownership of their recordings, potentially leaving the labels out in the cold.
Frank Stefanko/Sony Music Entertainment via HBO
Bruce Springsteen in an image from an HBO documentary on the making of 'Darkness on the Edge of Town.'
ArtsBeat
Breaking news about the arts, coverage of live events, critical reviews, multimedia and more.
Arts & Entertainment Guide
A sortable calendar of noteworthy cultural events in the New York region, selected by Times critics.

Readers’ Comments

Readers shared their thoughts on this article.
When copyright law was revised in the mid-1970s, musicians, like creators of other works of art, were granted “termination rights,” which allow them to regain control of their work after 35 years, so long as they apply at least two years in advance. Recordings from 1978 are the first to fall under the purview of the law, but in a matter of months, hits from 1979, like “The Long Run” by the Eagles and “Bad Girls” by Donna Summer, will be in the same situation — and then, as the calendar advances, every other master recording once it reaches the 35-year mark.
The provision also permits songwriters to reclaim ownership of qualifying songs. Bob Dylan has already filed to regain some of his compositions, as have other rock, pop and country performers like Tom Petty, Bryan Adams, Loretta Lynn, Kris Kristofferson, Tom Waits and Charlie Daniels, according to records on file at the United States Copyright Office.
“In terms of all those big acts you name, the recording industry has made a gazillion dollars on those masters, more than the artists have,” said Don Henley, a founder both of the Eagles and the Recording Artists Coalition, which seeks to protect performers’ legal rights. “So there’s an issue of parity here, of fairness. This is a bone of contention, and it’s going to get more contentious in the next couple of years.”
With the recording industry already reeling from plummeting sales, termination rights claims could be another serious financial blow. Sales plunged to about $6.3 billion from $14.6 billion over the decade ending in 2009, in large part because of unauthorized downloading of music on the Internet, especially of new releases, which has left record labels disproportionately dependent on sales of older recordings in their catalogs.
“This is a life-threatening change for them, the legal equivalent of Internet technology,” said Kenneth J. Abdo, a lawyer who leads a termination rights working group for the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences and has filed claims for some of his clients, who include Kool and the Gang. As a result the four major record companies — Universal, Sony BMG, EMI and Warner — have made it clear that they will not relinquish recordings they consider their property without a fight.
“We believe the termination right doesn’t apply to most sound recordings,” said Steven Marks, general counsel for the Recording Industry Association of America, a lobbying group in Washington that represents the interests of record labels. As the record companies see it, the master recordings belong to them in perpetuity, rather than to the artists who wrote and recorded the songs, because, the labels argue, the records are “works for hire,” compilations created not by independent performers but by musicians who are, in essence, their employees.

2 comments:

ugodabkydngme said...

Round one to the recording artists and songwriters....http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/village-people-ymca-lawsuit-victor-willis-321576

And here is an analysis of the of the potential impact of this first legal battle...

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/how-legal-fight-ymca-could-224469

and an article on the work for hire defense...

http://www.hypebot.com/hypebot/2012/02/screwed-forever-artist-list-is-your-favorite-artist-on-it-.html

ugodabkydngme said...

Investing in these reclaimed rights and royalties would be a very risky business venture. The concept of royalties could seem very foreign and silly 5-10 years from now if the radio stations disappear. (which will happen when no one listens to them... Whens the last time you walked in your house and turned on a radio station?) Very soon, the most important thing about the audio system in your car will be whether or not it connects to your phone, tablet, ipad, or other mobile computing device. Very soon, very few people are going to download and store music (and pay for that) They are just going to listen to it from whatever device they want to, whenever they want to, for free. Free and royalties do not play well together. That's how music went for 16 billion dollars in revenue to 9 billion in revenue It's like fighting over the last 10 glasses of water in the middle of a desert. Better get a new plan or die of thirst.